What 'Situation Room Photo' reveals about us - CNN.com →

(CNN) — By now, the photo is a classic. It’s become the most viewed image on Flickr — a mesmerizing picture that suggests as much as it reveals.

You may know it simply as the “Situation Room Photo,” but you may not be aware of what some say are three subliminal messages that make it so powerful and unusual.

The photo captures President Barack Obama huddled with his national security team in the White House Situation Room as they monitor via live video the capture and killing of Osama bin Laden.

Most commentators have focused on the historic nature of the photo: Obama staring at the screen with a grim intensity; Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, covering her mouth to repress her reaction — the epicenter of U.S. military power hunting down its most hated foe.

But look deeper and that photo becomes historic in a more subtle way. It’s a snapshot of how much this nation’s attitudes about race, women and presidential swagger are changing, several scholars and historians say.

“The photo is visually suggestive of a new American landscape that we’re still crossing into,” says Saladin Ambar, a political science professor at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania.

“When Obama was elected, there were some people who thought that we had crossed a racial threshold,” Ambar says. “What his presidency is revealing is that there are many crossings.”

A black man becomes ‘protector in chief’

The photo crosses one threshold of race in its unusual framing of an African-American man threatening violence, one black commentator says.

For much of U.S. history, the black man has often been portrayed as the threat to America’s safety — the angry man, the thug, the one you cross the street to avoid, says Cheryl Contee, co-founder of Jack & Jill Politics, a blog focused on current affairs from a black perspective.

But in the Situation Room photo, Contee says, the black man is America’s protector.

There’s no historical precedent for this image, she says. White Americans now see a black man not just as their president but their “protector in chief,” Contee says.

“That photo is amazing,” she says. “It’s another step toward rehabilitation of the image of black men in American culture. It’s going to forever impact how people see black men in America.”

The photo also resolves a tricky image problem for Obama, says Jerald Podair, a history professor at Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin.

Podair says Obama has always been careful to avoid the angry black male stereotype in his public persona, but has acquired another image — that of detachment, even weakness.

The photo of Obama hunkered down with his national security team watching the stalking and killing of bin Laden solves both problems, Podair says.

“He can now appear strong without being threatening. After all, he’s on our side. Obama can now take up his white predecessors’ mantle of ‘protector in chief,’ ” Podair says.

It’s not certain how long that mantle will stay attached to Obama, but at least one political scientist says he’s already seen the photo’s impact.

“This is one of the rare times that Tea Party supporters have referred to Obama as President Obama,” says Ari Kohen, an associate professor of social justice and political science at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Women at the center of power

The photo also breaks ground when it comes to women, others say.

The image is laced with testosterone: a crowded room full of powerful military and political men, some with medals bristling across their uniforms, gathered to drop America’s hammer.

Some online viewers compared it to the photos of D-Day during World War II. Another said it was a portrait of “the nexus of power in the Western world.”

But there were no iconic shots of women storming the beaches of Normandy or raising the flag at Iwo Jima.

Go back and examine the defining historic photos of American military might in action, and women are absent, historians say.

A glance at the now famous photos of President John F. Kennedy and his staff during the Cuban missile crisis is typical, says Ambar, the Lehigh University professor.

The photos show square-jawed men in crew cuts and uniforms surrounding Kennedy in the White House. You can practically smell the Aqua Velva in those old black-and-white photos.

“But if you go back and look at the Cuban missile crisis photos and the movies about it, there’s no women,” Ambar says. “In the movie ‘Thirteen Days,’ the only woman in the film was Kennedy’s secretary.”

Yet you see two powerful women in the Situation Room photograph — Clinton and Audrey Tomason, director for counterterrorism, who is straining to see from the back. Their inclusion shows how far women have come, Ambar says, even though Clinton’s response is ambiguous because she’s covering her mouth in what looks to be alarm.

“God only knows what she’s seeing on the screen,” Ambar says. (Clinton has since said she was trying not to cough.)

Lori Brown, a sociologist, says showing two women at the center of American military power is noteworthy, but Clinton’s gesture undermines some of its impact.

“Women are often more physical in their emotional responses and in a ‘power situation’ it may not seem as acceptable, but times are changing and the Situation Room needs to change, too,” says Brown, a professor of sociology at Meredith College in Raleigh, North Carolina. “Her emotions were more obvious, but I am sure many of the men in the room felt the same way she did.”

Obama gets a little swagger

The photo finally crosses the threshold of what may be called presidential swagger, historians say.

American presidents have traditionally sold themselves as our alpha male. Theodore Roosevelt went safari hunting; Ronald Reagan cleared brush at his ranch in a cowboy hat; George W. Bush did his “Top Gun” imitation when he donned a flight suit on the deck of an aircraft carrier.

“There’s a certain kind of machismo and swagger that Americans expect their president to reflect,” says Clarence Lusane, author of “The Black History of the White House.”

Projecting that presidential swagger was so powerful that it obscured some presidents’ serious illnesses, such as President Franklin Roosevelt’s polio and Kennedy’s hobbling assortment of ailments, including a bad back, Lusane says.

“They were both very ill. Kennedy could barely stand for two hours. But they never let those images out because they had to project toughness. Obama, though, is a different animal.”

The photo shows why.

If someone didn’t know who Obama was, he or she probably couldn’t tell that he was the president in the room, some scholars say.

“He’s not in the tallest chair,” says Brown, the sociology professor at Meredith College. “He’s not the center of attention. He’s not even in the middle of the room.”

Yet Obama’s willingness to be photographed without the typical Oval Office swagger gives birth to a new type of swagger, says Contee of Jack & Jill Politics.

She says that photo shows Obama’s self-assurance and leadership style. He seeks out the opinions of his advisers. He believes in collaboration — all while he’s taking down the baddest terrorist on the planet.

He doesn’t need to wear a “Top Gun” flight jacket to project strength, she says.

“You would almost expect the president to be standing in that position,” she says. “That shows his leadership style. He doesn’t need to thrust his leadership style forward.”

Expect more snapshots such as the one from the Situation Room, says Ambar, the Lehigh University professor.

As Obama moves into the third year of his term, photos will capture moments that show how far we’ve come.

“That’s part of what being the first African-American president is all about — we’re all being transformed together,” he says.

Ambar says he was so intrigued by the Situation Room photo that he cut it out to study it. He’s still parsing its meaning.

“It is an image unimaginable 30 years ago,” he says. “Let us hope we have more of these in the nation’s future.”

________________

More from the New York Times: 

MAY 4, 2011, 3:14 PM

The Power in a Photo

In The Conversation, David Brooks and Gail Collins talk between columns every Wednesday.

Tags:

barack obama, osama bin laden

David Brooks: Gail, I think it was Karl Marx who said that all great events happen twice, first as the event and then as the packaging. We’re finished with the killing of Osama bin Laden, now we are having a debate about the presentation of the event.

Gail Collins: I believe Marx made that remark at the premier of “Das Kapital VI: The Proletariat Take Vegas.”

David Brooks: The White House has just announced that it will not release the photo of the dead Bin Laden. Six months ago this would have been an easy call and obviously the right one. But if it takes the release of the birth certificate to quiet conspiracy theories in this country, maybe it will take a photo of a bullet wound in the terror leader’s head to quiet conspiracy theories in the febrile regions of the Middle East.

Gail Collins: I kind of think that if you show conspiracy theorists a photo of the dead Bin Laden they will come up with an explanation for why it’s really a Photoshoped picture of Bin Laden asleep. Or his dead cousin Fred. Donald Trump apparently believes that Bin Laden is dead, so that ought to be enough for the Middle East.

David Brooks: In the end, this is probably not a subject people like me should be passing judgment on. I assume the administration discussed this with a wide range of Muslim leaders and radical Islamicists, and decided that releasing the photo would dishonor the dead in the eyes of the devout.

Gail Collins: This is why I’m never going to be president. I was actually worried about whether the picture would frighten little kids who happened to be walking by the TV or newsstand when bullet-in-the-head photos were on display.

David Brooks: Did you notice, by the way, that the Palestinian leadership was among those most angered by the killing? Bin Laden lost popularity in many parts of the Arab world, but he remained popular among Palestinians. I noticed that Hamas condemned the killing and called Bin Laden a holy warrior. Does it really seem possible that Israel, under any leadership, is going to be able to cut a deal with people who revere Bin Laden?

Gail Collins: The whole point of getting serious peace negotiations going is to give the Palestinian people the hope that if they opt for the moderate leadership in the West Bank, they’ll be rewarded with a viable country of their own. If you say that the leadership in Gaza is awful and, therefore, we are never going to negotiate with the Palestinians in good faith, then you play into the hands of the crazy people.

David Brooks: The other photo I’ve been fascinated by is the one of the president’s security team gathered in the White House Situation Room. The first thing the photo illustrates is that whenever we disagree with an office holder, we should all nonetheless pay them a large dose of respect. Presidents and others make these horrific decisions that could lead to death and suffering for people thousands of miles away, and then they sit passively far removed from the action, hoping that things turn out right.

On a human level I’m struck by the varied emotions etched on people’s faces. I can read nothing on Bob Gates’s face or even Joe Biden’s, whereas Obama, Denis McDonough andJohn Brennan look tense. Hilary Clinton’s face is the most riveting, a mixture of anxiety, dread and concern. I suspect most people will relate to her expression.

Gail Collins: Did they have to pick the one where Hillary had her hand over her mouth? The secretary of state doesn’t need to prove her toughness, but it would be nice if the definitive photo didn’t show the only woman in the room looking stricken.

David Brooks: The second thing the photo shows is how small the room is. In the movies, executive decisions are made in big, Roman Empire type rooms. But the White House is an early 19th century kind of place. It does all it can to humble the people who work there with its smallness, at least in the work areas.

The posture of the president is fascinating. Instead of occupying the power chair in the center of the table, he is perched on a low chair off the side, hunched over looking tense. If you just looked at this picture, you might think that Joe Biden was president or Bill Daley, who is standing behind looking imposing and grave. You’d think Obama was a midlevel aide.

Gail Collins: The president really did put all his chips on the line. These are the kind of moments we elected him for — we knew from the financial crisis that when all hell breaks loose, he doesn’t lose his cool.

But he’s also lucky. People partly make their own fortunes, but I wonder if he’d have had the confidence to take such a huge gamble if he didn’t believe innately that he’s the kind of guy fortune favors.

Meanwhile, our report says Biden was fingering his rosary beads. Luck is good, but the Blessed Virgin Mary is better.

David Brooks: In the case of Obama’s perch in the Situation Room, I think what happened is this: some sort of communication or technical relay had to be done, so the president got out of his chair and relinquished it to Brig. Gen. Brad Webb, who is the assistant commanding general of the Joint Special Operations Command. The president just slid over to the low chair off to the side, which one of the standers must have relinquished.

Still, I wonder how many White Houses would have been confident enough to release a photo with the president looking so diminutive. I think it speaks well of Obama and the administration that they released this as the iconic image of the decision-making process behind the event.

Gail Collins: They wouldn’t have released it if they hadn’t won. And isn’t it interesting how big a deal this was? Bin Laden wasn’t all that central to the terrorist network any more, but taking him down created a kind of national catharsis. It’s been a really, really long time since we had something to celebrate that didn’t involve a sports team. I’d rather it had been a non-death-related occasion, but we’ll take what we can get.

1 year ago  /  0 notes  /